MODERATING INFLUENCE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ON ORGANIZATIONAL RESOURCES AND PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIES IN KENYA

EZEKIEL WECHULI WANYAMA

Abstract


The objective of this study was to determine the influence of corporate governance on the relationship between organizational resources and performance of regional development authorities in Kenya. The specific objectives were to determine the influence of financial resources on the performance of regional development authorities in Kenya and establish the moderating effect of corporate governance on the relationship between financial resources and performance of regional development authorities in Kenya. The study was guided by resource based theory, dynamic capabilities theory and stewardship theory. The study adopted explanatory research design. The study was conducted in six regional development authorities that cover 47 counties. This includes Kerio Valley Development Authority, Ewaso Ngiro South Development Authority, Ewaso Ngiro North Development Authority, Coast Development Authority, Lake Basin Development Authority, Tana and Athi Rivers Development Authority. The targeted population was 169 comprising of chief managers, managers, heads of department and chief accountant. The study used stratified random sampling to select 118. Primary data was collected using structured questionnaires and interview schedules. Pilot study was conducted to test validity and reliability of research instruments. Validity was ascertained using content and construct validity while reliability using Cronbach alpha. Quantitative data was analyzed using STATA version 15. Model estimation and hypotheses testing adopted Structural Equation Modeling using AMOS version 23. Path diagram was used to establish the interrelationship between organization resources and performance via corporate governance.  The null hypotheses were tested at 5% significance level. The findings revealed that corporate governance has significant moderating influence on the relationship between organizational resources and performance. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) supported three paths corporate governance and organizational resources, corporate governance and performance as well as organizational resources and performance of RDA. Therefore, the study concluded that corporate governance is significant moderator between organizational resources and performance of regional development authorities. The study recommended that regional development authorities ought to reduce overdependence on exchequer to resources but generate their own financial resources. The study also recommended that board should be diverse in terms of gender, relevant industry experience and independent board member from the management.

Keyword: Technological Resources, Corporate Governance, Performance, Regional Development Authorities

CITATION: Wanyama, E. W. (2020). Moderating influence of corporate governance on organizational resources and performance: Evidence from regional development authorities in Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 7(3), 29 – 45.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Agrawal, A., & Nasser, T. (2012). Insider trading in takeover targets. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(3), 598-625.

Aliyu, N. S., Jamil, C. Z. M., & Mohamed, R. (2014). The mediating role of management control system in the relationship between corporate governance and the performance of bailed-out banks in Nigeria. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164, 613-620.

Barney, J., & Hesterly, W. S. (2012). Strategic Management and Corporate Competitive Advantage: Concepts.

Claessens, S., & Yurtoglu, B. B. (2013). Corporate governance in emerging markets: A survey. Emerging markets review, 15, 1-33.

Crook, T. R., Ketchen, D. J.Jr., Combs, J.G. & Todd, S.Y. (2008). Strategic resources & performance: a meta-analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1141-1154.

Crook, T. R., Todd, S.Y., Combs, J.G., Woehr, D.J. & Ketchen, D. J.Jr., (2011). Does human capital matter? A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Human Capital and Firm Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3) 443-456.

Davidson, R., Goodwin‐Stewart, J., & Kent, P. (2015). Internal governance structures and earnings management. Accounting & Finance, 45(2), 241-267.

Dignam, A., & Lowry, J. (2016). Corporate governance: corporate governance and corporate theory. Company Law, Core Text Series, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 350-70.

Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of management, 16(1), 49-64.

Ederman, L. F., Brush, C.G. & Manolova, T. (2005). Co-alignment in resource – performance relationship: Strategy as a mediator. Journal of Business Venturing, 20,359-383.

Gaturu, P. M. (2018). Influence of Strategic Management Practices on Organizational Performance of Mission Hospitals in Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, JKUAT-COHRED).

Gillis, W. E., Combs, J. G., & Ketchen Jr, D. J. (2014). Using Resource–Based Theory to Help Explain Plural Form Franchising. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(3), 449-472.

Hamdan, A. M., Buallay, A. M., & Alareeni, B. A. (2017). The moderating role of corporate governance on the relationship between intellectual capital efficiency and firm's performance: evidence from Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 14(4), 295-318.

Heenetigala, K.,(2011). Corporate regulation and corporate governance of small businesses in Australia. Journal of Business Systems, Governance and Ethics, 6(3), 43-52.

Hitt M. A, Bierman, L. Uhlenbruck, K. Shimizu, K. (2006). The importance of resources in internationalization of professional service firms. The good, the bad and the ugly. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1137-1157.

Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D., & Hoskisson, R.E. (2011). Strategic management: competitiveness and globalization. Boulevard, South Western Cengage Learning.

Hsu, W. L., Wang, G. Y., Tsai, H., & Lu, C. (2012, April). The moderating and mediating effects of corporate governance on firm performance. In ACACOS’12 Proceedings of the 11th WSEAS International Conference onApplied Computers and Applied Computational Science (pp. 113-119).

Huang, C. J. (2010). Corporate governance, corporate social responsibility and corporate performance. Journal of management & organization, 16(5), 641-655.

Jacoby, S. M. (2018). The embedded corporation: Corporate governance and employment relations in Japan and the United States. Princeton University Press.

Joslin, R., & Müller, R. (2016). The relationship between project governance and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 34(4), 613-626.

Juma, O. W. (2014). Organizational resources, corporate governance structures and performance of Kenyan state corporations. Unpublished MBA Thesis.

Juma, O. W. (2014). Organizational resources, corporate governance structures and performance of Kenyan state corporations. Unpublished MBA Thesis.

Klöckner, O. (2009). Buy-outs in Family Businesses: Changes in corporate governance, instruments of managerial control, and financial practices. Springer.

Letting, N. K., Aosa E. and Machuki, V.N. (2012). Board diversity and performance of companies listed in Nairobi stock exchange. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2, 11.

Letting, N. K., Wasike, E. R., Kinuu D., Murgor P., Ongeti, W. J., and Aosa E. (2012). Corporate governance theories and their application to boards of directors: A Critical Review of Literature. Prime Journal of Business Administration and Management, 2, (12)782-787.

Love, I., & Rachinsky, A. (2015). Corporate governance and bank performance in emerging markets: evidence from Russia and Ukraine. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 51(sup2), S101-S121.

Mwau, P. M., Oloko, M., & Muturi, W. (2017). The moderating effect of ownership structure on the relationship between the growth strategies and the performance of firms within the insurance industry in Kenya.

Nurdin, D., & Kasim, M. Y. (2017). Moderator Effect of Corporate Governance on the Relationship of Financial Performance and Dividend Policy, and Its Impact on Firm Value in Indonesia Stock Exchange International Journal of Economics &. International Journal of Economics & Managementy Sciences, 7(1), 1-7.

OECD, O. (2004). The OECD principles of corporate governance. Contaduría y Administración, (216).

Paulraj, A. (2011). Understanding the relationships between internal resources and capabilities, sustainable supply management and organizational sustainability. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(1), 19-37.

Pearce II, J.A., Robinson, R.B., & Mital, A. (2012). Strategic management: formulation, implementation and control. 12th ed. New Delhi, Tata McGraw Hill Education Private Ltd.

Sarbah, A., & Xiao, W. (2015). Good corporate governance structures: A must for family businesses. Open Journal of Business and Management, 3(01), 40.

Sebastian, A. Y. (2018). Effects of Budgeting on Performance: A Study of Selected Manufacturing Firms in Kinondoni District Dar es salaam Tanzania (Doctoral dissertation, The Open University of Tanzania).

Shen, W. (2003). The dynamics of the CEO-board relationship: An evolutionary perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 466-476.

Sulaiman, N. (2016). The impact of financial knowledge and capabilities on SME firm performance in Australia.

Vinten, G., & Mardjono, A. (2015). A tale of corporate governance: lessons why firms fail. Managerial Auditing Journal.

Wills‐Johnson, N. (2008). The networked firm: a framework for RBV. Journal of Management development.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v7i3.1656

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.