EFFECTS OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: A CASE OF SELECTED MANUFACTURING COMPANIES ON THE NAIROBI SECURITIES EXCHANGE

MERCY NANYAMA OMUHAYA, DR. ABRAHAM MALENYA (Ph.D)

Abstract


Whether a business is a startup or a going concern, it requires funds to carry out its activities as no success is achievable in the absence of fund. The needed fund may be for daily running or business expansions. This tells how important in the life of a business. Capital of firms when sourced, it becomes a burden on enterprises simply because it is other persons' resources which they are to compensate as they derive maximum benefits from it. Therefore, the firm capital structure is intended to provide maximum performance for the cost capital and the profitability for the business. The ability of the organization to carry out their stakeholders need is closely related to the capital structure. The determination of a company’s capital structure is a difficult task to achieve. The general objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between capital structure and financial performance of manufacturing firms listed in the Nairobi Securities Exchange. Specifically, the study aimed to evaluate long term debt to asset ratio, short term debt to asset ratio, debt equity ratio, liquidity ratio and firm size, of manufacturing firms listed in the Nairobi Securities Exchange. The study used panel data of selected manufacturing Companies including BOC, British American Tobacco, CarbAcid Kenya, East African Breweries Ltd, Eveready Kenya, Mumias Sugar and Unga Group limited for a period of 9 years. Thus the groups were 7 and the time period was 9 years. All the independent variables are statistically significant. The coefficient of Long-term Debt to Asset ratio is positively related to performance meaning that the higher the Debt to Asset ratio, the greater the profitability. The short-term Debt to Asset Ratio is negatively related to profitability and hence performance of the manufacturing firm. Debt to equity ratio has a positive relationship with performance of a firm. The higher the debt to Equity ratio, the more the profitability hence higher performance of the firm. From the results a high long-term debt to asset ratio increases profitability of a firm whereas a high short-term debt to asset ratio and a high debt to equity ratio lower the performance of a manufacturing firm.

Key Words: Long Term Debt to Asset Ratio, Short Term Debt to Asset Ratio, Debt Equity Ratio, Liquidity Ratio, Firm Size

CITATION Omuhaya, M. N., & Malenya, A. (2020). Effects of capital structure on financial performance: A case of selected manufacturing companies on the Nairobi Securities Exchange. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 7(3), 609 – 530.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abor, J. (2005). The effect of capital structure on profitability: an empirical analysis of listedfirms in Ghana. The Journal of Risk Finance, 6(5), 438-445.

Abor, J. (2007). Debt policy and performance of SMEs. Journal of Risk Finance, 8(4), 364-379.

Aivaziam, E. (2010). Supply and demand for finance of small enterprises in Ghana: World Bank Publications.

Al-Sakran, S. A. (2009). Leverage determinants in the absence of corporate tax system: the case of non-financial publicly traded corporations in Saudi Arabia [Electronic Version],27, 58-86.

Baker, S. L., Hill, N. C., &Sundaram, S. (2003). An empirical test of stakeholder theory predictions of capital structure. 18(1), 36-44.

Barclay, M. J., & Smith, C. W. (2006). On financial architecture: Leverage, maturity, andpriority. 8(4), 4-17.

Berger, A. N., & di Patti, B. (2006). Capital structure and firm performance: A new approach to testing agency theory and an application to the banking industry (Vol. 30, pp. 1065-1102): Elsevier.

Bradley, M., Jarrell, G. A., & Kim, E. H. (2007). On the existence of an optimal capital structure: The structure and pricing of corporate debt covenants. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting.

Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2007). Fundamentals of financial management: Cengage Learning.

Castanias, R. (2003). Bankruptcy risk and optimal capital structure. Journal of Finance, 7(5), 1617-1635.

Cosh, A. D., & Hughes, A. (1994). Size, financial structure and profitability [ElectronicVersion].

Dhankar, R. S., & Boora, A. S. (2006). Cost of Capital, Optimal Capital Structure, and Value of Firm: All Empirical Study of Indian Companies (Vol. 21, pp. 29-36): the Indian institute of management.

Dirmirguc-Kunt, I. D., &Marsimovic, D. J. (2009). Large-sample evidence on the debt covenant hypothesis. 40(4), 1091-1123.

Erasmus, P. D. (2008). Evaluating Value Based Financial Performance Measures.

Esperança, J. P., and, P. M. G. A., &Mohamed., A. G. (2007). Corporate debt policy of smallfirms: An empirical (re)examination”. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 1062–80.

Esperanca, J. P., Gama, A. P. M., &Gulamhussen, M. A. (2003). Corporate debt policy ofsmall firms: an empirical (re) examination. 10(1), 62-80.

Fama, E. O. & French, J. (2008). Dynamic capital structure choice: Theoryand tests. Journal of Finance 44(1), 19-40.

Friend, I., & Lang, L. H. P. (1988a). An empirical test of the impact of managerial self-intereston corporate capital structure. Journal of Finance, 271-281.

Friend, I., & Lang, L. H. P. (1988b). An empirical test of the impact of managerial self-intereston corporate capital structure. 43(2), 271-281.

Gleason, K. C., Mathur, L. K., &Mathur, I. (2010). The Interrelationship between Culture,Capital Structure, and Performance:: Evidence from European Retailers. 50(2), 185-191.

Hall, M., &Raviv, A. (2004). The theory of capital structure. 46(1), 297-355.

Hutchinson, P. J. (2005). Determinants of the capital structures of European SMEs. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 31(5-6), 711-728.

Holmes, S., & Kent, P. (1991). An empirical analysis of the financial structure of small andlarge Australian manufacturing enterprises. 1(2), 141-154.

Michaelas, N. (2011). Financial policy and capital structure choice in UK SMEs: empirical evidence from company panel data. Small Business Economics, 12(2), 113-130.

Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. 48(3), 261-297.

Myers, S. C. (2000). Determinants of corporate borrowing* 1. 5(2), 147-175.

Pandey, I. M. (2005). Financial Management (Vol. Ninth Edition): Vikas Publishing HousePVT LTD.

Quan, V. D. H. (2002). A rational justification of the pecking order hypothesis to the choice of sources of financing (Vol. 25, pp. 74-90): Emerald, 60/62 Toller Lane, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD 8 9 BY, UK.

Rajan, R. G., &Zingales, L. (2005). What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. Journal of Finance 50(5), 1421-1460.

Scherr, F. C., Sugrue, T. F., & Ward, J. B. (1993). Financing the small firm start-up: Determinants of debt use. 3(1), 17-36.

Titman, S., &Wessels, R. (2009). The determinants of capital structure choice. Journal of Finance, 43(1), 1-19.

Van der Wijst, &Thurm, J. K. (2003). How firm characteristics affect capital structure: an internationalcomparison. Journal of Financial Research 22(2), 161.

Wedig, G., Sloan, F. A., Hassan, M., &Morrisey, M. A. (1988). Capital structure, ownership, and capital payment policy: The case of hospitals. 43(1), 21-40.

Mead, D. C. and Liedholm, C. (1998). The dynamics of micro and small enterprises in developing countries. World Development, 26(1), 61-74.

Jain, B.A., &Kini, O. (1994). The post-issue operating performance of IPO firms. Journal of Finance, 49, 1699-1726.

Mikkelson, W.H., Partch, M.M. & Shah, K. 1997, "Ownership and operating performance of companies that go public", Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 281- 307.

Kerlinger, FN (1986). Foundations of behavioural research. Harcourt Brave Jovanovich.

Mugenda, O.M.and Mugenda, A.G (2003). Research Methods Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches, ACT : Nairobi, Kenya.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v7i3.1698

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 2 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
  Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.